Cases 21 - 30 of 642
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00797
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mahe v. Bavrava et al.
as 1:2023cv02306
Plaintiff:
Jason A. Mahe
Defendant:
Doctor Bavrava, D.H.C.A. Lewis, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03962
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Woodard
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis v. McConahay
as 1:2023cv02254
Petitioner:
Deonte Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Tim McConahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. State of Ohio, et al
as 1:2023cv02252
Petitioner:
Rebeccah Lewis
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Respondent:
Warden Erin Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Sloan
as 3:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Bruce Anthony Lewis
Defendant:
Deandre Lamar Sloan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Lewis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03289
Plaintiff:
Rodney Lewis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2023cv03271
Plaintiff:
James E Lewis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis v. Mas Restaurant Group, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03157
Plaintiff:
Faith Lewis
Defendant:
Mas Restaurant Group, LLC and MRG Ohio, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lewis v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03124
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lewis
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
