Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Perez v. Textron, Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00424
Plaintiff:
Alma I. Perez
Defendant:
Textron, Inc, Terrence O'Donnell, Douglas Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Felton v. Textron, Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00421
Plaintiff:
Susan Felton
Defendant:
Textron, Inc, Lewis B. Campbell, Lawrence K. Fish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System v. Textron, Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00367
Plaintiff:
City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Textron, Inc, Lewis B. Campbell and Ted R French
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Cannady v. Rathke et al
as 1:2009cv00007
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Cannady
Defendant:
Wade Rathke, Dale Rathke, Steven Kest and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arta Mae Lewis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02651
Plaintiff:
Arta Mae Lewis, Arta Mae Lewis, Arta Mae Lewis and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DCFS USA LLC v. Lewbar Imports, Inc. et al
as 1:2008mc00042
Plaintiff:
DCFS USA LLC
Defendant:
Lewbar Imports, Inc., Susan Pollack, Beth Veltri and others
Joles et al v. Computer Sciences Corporation
as 1:2008cv00166
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Joles, Everett C. Lewis, III and Thomas Dobbing
Defendant:
Computer Sciences Corporation and Computer Sciences Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02224
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Brown
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Zachariah v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02208
Plaintiff:
Dan Lewis Zachariah
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Harris v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02282
Plaintiff:
Lewis W. Harris
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
