Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jermaine Stewart v. John C. Heath et al
as 2:2022cv03768
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Stewart
Defendant:
John C. Heath Attorney at Law PC doing business as Lexington Law and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Leeroy Williams v. Lexington Law Firm, et al
as 2:2020cv03617
Defendant:
Lexington Law Firm and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Leeroy Williams
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Lucine Trim et al v. John C. Health, Attorney At Law PC
as 2:2020cv02161
Defendant:
JOHN C. HEATH, ATTORNEY AT LAW PC, John C. Health, Attorney At Law PC and John C. Health, Attorney At Law PC a Utah corporation doing business as Lexington Law Firm
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FREY and LUCINE TRIM
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Martin Starace v. Lexington Law Firm
as 19-16418
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN STARACE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
LEXINGTON LAW FIRM
Starace v. Lexington Law Firm
as 1:2018at00844
Defendant:
Lexington Law Firm
Plaintiff:
Martin Starace
Starace v. Lexington Law Firm
as 1:2018cv01596
Defendant:
Lexington Law Firm
Plaintiff:
Martin Starace
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Abante Rooting and Plumbing, Inc. v. Lexington Law Firm
as 3:2018cv05219
Plaintiff:
Abante Rooting and Plumbing, Inc.
Defendant:
Lexington Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Kristyna Souders v. Lexington Law Firm
as 2:2018cv05791
Plaintiff:
Kristyna Souders
Defendant:
Lexington Law Firm and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Terry Fabricant et al v. Lexington Law Firm et al
as 2:2018cv03916
Plaintiff:
Abante Rooting and Plumbing Inc. and Terry Fabricant
Defendant:
Does and Lexington Law Firm
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
