Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Keplinger et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01696
Plaintiff:
Edward Keplinger and Libby Keplinger
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Parents Defending Education v. Olentangy Local School District Board of Education et al
as 2:2023cv01595
Plaintiff:
Parents Defending Education
Defendant:
Olentangy Local School District Board of Education, Mark T Raiff, Peter Stern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reynolds v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02820
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Libby Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Myrice v. Piston Automotive, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00295
Defendant:
Piston Automotive, LLC and Libbi Robel
Plaintiff:
Daniel Myrice
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Stone et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01566
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Libby Stone and Daniel R. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McIntosh v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05264
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Libby M McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noco Company v. Libby
as 1:2019cv00126
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Ronald Russ Libby
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Libby v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01393
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
George Libby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Navarro v. Proctor & Gamble Company et al
as 1:2017cv00406
Plaintiff:
Annette Navarro
Defendant:
LPK Global Brand Design Agency, Saatchi & Saatchi X and Walmart Inc.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Proctor & Gamble Company
3Rd Party Defendant:
Libby Perszyk Kathman Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
