Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Aaron Clark, IV v. Adams, et al
as 22-1620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ADAMS, T. LOVATO, Correctional Officer, RALPH SACKETT, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor and others
Stanley Gibbs, et al v. Mark Skytta, et al
as 21-1518
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY L. GIBBS
Defendant / Appellee:
CORDANARO, Correctional Officer, UNKNOWN WICKSTROM, Lieutenant, MARK SKYTTA, Correctional Officer and others
Jerry Bailey, Jr. v. Mark Skytta, et al
as 20-1168
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC PETAJA, Inspector, LINCOLN MARSHALL, Deputy Warden, MARK SKYTTA, Corrections Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY DOWELL BAILEY, JR.
Bender #163870 v. Snyder et al
as 2:2019cv00039
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bender #163870
Defendant:
Dan Lesatz, Lincoln Marshall and Keith Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maurice Moore v. Carmen Palmer, et al
as 16-2039
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MAURICE MOORE
Defendant:
CARMEN PALMER
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES ALEXANDER, CHAD LACOUNT, LINCOLN MARSHALL and others
Gresham #272603 v. Meder et al
as 2:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
Terry Meder, Kirtida A. Patel, Neil Fred Pascue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garza #270734 v. Homeland Security et al
as 1:2012cv01417
Petitioner:
Dimas Garza #270734
Respondent:
Homeland Security, United States of America, Rick Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. Palmer et al
as 1:2012cv14783
Plaintiff:
Maurice Moore
Defendant:
Carmen Palmer, Timothy Kipp, Anthony Stewart and others
Malott #467434 v. Marshall et al
as 2:2012cv00405
Plaintiff:
Michael Malott #467434
Defendant:
Lincoln Marshall, Casey Tallio and Robert Napel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malott v. Marshall et al
as 2:2012cv14476
Plaintiff:
Michael Malott
Defendant:
Lincoln Marshall, Casey Tallio and Robert Napel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
