Cases 1 - 10 of 12
LIVENGOOD v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
FRED A. LIVENGOOD
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
CRAVENER v. MCCLISTER et al
as 2:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. CRAVENER, SR.
Defendant:
JUDGE CHASE MCCLISTER, ASST DISTRICT ATTORN REBECCA LOZZI, WARDEN JESSICA HICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LIVENGOOD v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO. et al
as 2:2022cv00826
Plaintiff:
LEONARD LIVENGOOD
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO., THE HARTFORD INSURANCE CO, THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
LIVENGOOD v. MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01101
Plaintiff:
TERRI LIVENGOOD
Defendant:
MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. and ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LIVENGOOD v. COLVIN
as 2:2013cv00744
Plaintiff:
RANDY L. LIVENGOOD
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
LIVENGOOD et al v. BASHORE et al
as 2:2012cv01074
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE LIVENGOOD and GERALD P. LIVENGOOD
Defendant:
JAMES BASHORE, JR., J&B LEASING INCORPORATED and RONALD W. JACQUESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
LIVENGOOD v. BASHORE et al
as 2:2012cv01075
Plaintiff:
WIL LIVENGOOD
Defendant:
JAMES BASHORE, JR., J&B LEASING INCORPORATED and RONALD W. JACQUESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIVENGOOD v. MEEKS
as 1:2012cv00081
Petitioner:
PAUL RENO LIVENGOOD
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LIVENGOOD v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
RANDY L. LIVENGOOD
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
LIVENGOOD v. MAXIMUM RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC
as 2:2008cv01650
Plaintiff:
DAVID LIVENGOOD
Defendant:
MAXIMUM RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
