Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Zeilnhofer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Edward Lloyd Zeilnhofer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Grefer v. Cayuga County et al
as 5:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Grefer
Defendant:
Cayuga County and Lloyd E. Haskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grefer v. Cayuga County et al
as 9:2022cv01400
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Grefer
Defendant:
Cayuga County and Lloyd E. Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2022cv01295
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lloyd Berger
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Beeman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00580
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Matthew Beeman, IV
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thomas v. Town of Lloyd et al
as 1:2021cv01358
Plaintiff:
Alton Thomas
Defendant:
Town of Lloyd, Town of Lloyd Police Department, Town of Plattekill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00316
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sealed Defendant #2 v. USA
as 8:2020cv01389
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Patrick Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Berger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv00293
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lloyd Berger
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fava v. Ward et al
as 9:2020cv00156
Defendant:
Joseph T. Ward, Jr., Ryan A. Albright, Lieutenant Lloyd J. Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
James P. Fava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
