Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LOCKETT v. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv02935
Plaintiff:
MAURICE LOCKETT
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and DC CENTRAL DETENTION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
as 1:2019mc00145
Defendant:
CHADRICK EVAN FULKS, PAUL LAIRD, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
ALFRED BOURGEOIS, JULIUS ROBINSON, JAMES H. ROANE, JR., and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BRUCE WEBSTER, ANTHONY BATTLE and ORLANDO HALL
Intervenor Defendant:
RICHARD VEACH
Intervenor:
JEFFREY PAUL
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Alfred Evans v. Charles Lockett
as 19-5062
Respondent / Appellee:
Charles L. Lockett, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
Alfred Evans
EVANS v. LOCKETT
as 1:2017cv02619
Petitioner:
ALFRED EVANS
Respondent:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
James Crawford v. Charles Lockett
as 15-5157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James B. Crawford
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles L. Lockett, Warden
CRAWFORD v. LOCKETT
as 1:2015cv00558
Plaintiff:
JAMES CRAWFORD
Defendant:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewis Waters v. Charles Lockett
as 13-5275
Petitioner - Appellant:
Lewis Waters
Respondent - Appellee:
Charles L. Lockett, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
