Cases 11 - 20 of 248
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01674
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01664
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Bayron Gonzalez v. Loretta Lynch, et al
as 16-4121
Petitioner - Appellant:
BAYRON A. GONZALEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States, BILL PRIM, Present Warden of McHenry County Jail, Woodstock, Illinois, JEFF CHARLES JOHNSON, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Marvin Barchan v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-4081
Petitioner:
MARVIN BARCHAN
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2016cv10997
Plaintiff:
Ashkan Kheirkhahvash and Robert Cowan
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson, Loretta E LYNCH, Leon Rodriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jorge Luis Minier Casado v. Loretta E. Lynch
as 16-4044
Petitioner:
JORGE LUIS MINIER CASADO
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States
Hector Amaya v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-4042
Petitioner:
HECTOR AMAYA
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States
Martin Orellana-Cordova v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-4009
Petitioner:
MARTIN ORELLANA-CORDOVA
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States
Vladimir Cojocari, et al v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-3941
Petitioner:
VLADIMIR COJOCARI and VERONICA MORARU
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States
FRANCISCAN HEALTH INDIANAPOLIS v. BURWELL
as 1:2016cv03142
Defendant:
SYLVIA BURWELL
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCAN HEALTH INDIANAPOLIS
Interested Party:
Loretta E. Lynch and Josh Minkler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
