Cases 61 - 70 of 324
ABBOTT v. FOLINO
as 2:2013cv03760
Petitioner:
HASAN ABBOTT
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRYANT v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03724
Petitioner:
KENNETH BRYANT
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and LOUIS FOLINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03705
Petitioner:
SAMUEL EDWARD SMITH
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS FOLINO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ADKINS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03652
Petitioner:
ERNEST ADKINS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and LOUIS FOLINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOOPER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03706
Petitioner:
BRIAN HOOPER
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and LOUIS FOLINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HICKS v. FOLINO, et al.
as 2:2013cv00855
Petitioner:
KEITH HICKS
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv01707
Petitioner:
Jerrell M. Stewart
Respondent:
John Wetzel, Louis Folino and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. FOLINO
as 1:2013cv00167
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO
Petitioner:
MACK D'JUAN HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HULL v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2013cv00839
Petitioner:
JOHN M. HULL
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jonathan Tusa, Jr. v. Louis Folino, et al
as 13-2789
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN ROBERT TUSA, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
