Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Randolph v. Dzurenda
as 24-1647
Petitioner:
LOUIS RANDOLPH and Clyde Lewis
Respondent:
JAMES DZURENDA
COLBERT v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
LOUIS RANDOLPH COLBERT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SSA MARTIN O'MALLEY and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Randolph v. Dzurendas
as 2:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Louis Randolph and Clyde Lewis
Respondent:
James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clyde Lewis v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 22-16547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLYDE LEWIS, AKA Louis Randolph
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, Director, NDOC, BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, Sr., Warden, SDCC, MINOR ADAMS, Asst. Warden, SDCC and others
Thompson v. Hassan et al
as 3:2021cv03028
Defendant:
Louis Randolph Savel, Martin Gore and Rey Hassan
Plaintiff:
Tracey N. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2019cv01729
Plaintiff:
Clyde Lewis and Louis Randolph
Defendant:
M. Travis, James Dzurenda, Timothy Filson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00085
Defendant:
Dreesen, Harris, Justin and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00381
Defendant:
Dreesen, Harris, Justin and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Savel
as 3:2016cv04703
Plaintiff:
Tracey N. Thompson
Defendant:
Louis Randolph Savel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Farring v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company
as 2:2012cv00479
Plaintiff:
Louis Randolph Farring
Defendant:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
