Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Lowell Quincy Green v. State of Texas Government, et al
as 23-3191
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOWELL QUINCY GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, Government, TARRANT COUNTY, MCLENNAN COUNTY and others
Green v. Stanley, et al.
as 5:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
M.D. Reynaldo Stanley, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01079
Petitioner:
Lowell Quincy Green
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Mendez
as 23-50581
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant / Appellee:
Donna L. Mendez and Et Al
Green v. McClennan County District Attorney, et al
as 5:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
McClennan County District Attorney, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Fourth Court of Appeals, et al
as 5:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
Fourth Court of Appeals, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Warden F/N/U Cooper, et al
as 5:2023cv01002
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
Warden F/N/U Cooper, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Donna L. Mendez, et al
as 5:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
Donna L. Mendez, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. U.S. District Court Employees of Eastern District of Texas, et al
as 5:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
U.S. District Court Employees of Eastern District of Texas, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Pulliam, et al
as 5:2023cv00901
Petitioner:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
Judge Jason K. Pulliam and Judge Jason K. Pulliam, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
