Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Caravan Canopy Int'l Inc v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv06952
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Plaintiff:
Caravan Canopy Int'l Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Caravan Canopy Intl, Inc. v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv01072
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC, Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Caravan Canopy Int'l Inc and Caravan Canopy Intl, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Chia-Ling Huang v. Lowes Home Center, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv10545
Plaintiff:
Chia Ling Huang
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Center, LLC, Does 1-20, inclusive, Lowes Home Center, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Epistar Corporation v. Lowes Companies, Inc et al
as 2:2017cv03219
Plaintiff:
Epistar Corporation
Defendant:
Lowes Companies, Inc and Lowes Home Centers, LLC
CryptoPeak Solutions, LLC v. Rakuten Commerce, LLC d/b/a Rakuten.com
as 2:2015cv01730
Consolidated Defendant:
AT&T Corp., Office Depot, Inc., Evite, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Buy.com Inc. d/b/a Rakuten.com, Tumblr, Inc. and Rakuten Commerce, LLC d/b/a Rakuten.com
Not Classified By Court:
David Folsom
Plaintiff:
CryptoPeak Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Vaxcel International Co,. LTD. v. HeathCo LLC
as 1:2015cv00696
Plaintiff:
Vaxcel International Co,. LTD.
Defendant:
HeathCo LLC, Lowe's Companies, Inc. and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Intervenor:
NORTH TECH INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
RICHMOND v. NINGBO HANGSHUN ELECTRICAL CO., LTD. et al
as 3:2013cv01944
Defendant:
UNBEATABLESALE.COM, INC., ALPINE CORP., OUTSOURCING IN ASIA LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SIMON NICHOLAS RICHMOND
Counter Claimant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., TARGET CORP. and CREATIVE INDUSTRIES, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
HON. JOHN J. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
