Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Lane v. Baker et al
as 1:2024cv11271
Defendant:
Charles D Baker, Charlie Baker, Barbara McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lane v. Wu et al
as 1:2024cv11273
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Michelle Wu, Brittany Vo, London Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lane v. Collins et al
as 1:2024cv11272
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Nick Collins, Nick Collins' Son, Randi H Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lane v. Walsh et al
as 1:2024cv11275
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Martin Joseph Walsh, Joan Marie Duffy, Randi H Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lane v. Children Hospital
as 1:2024cv10627
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Children Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lane v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2024cv10359
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
John McCarthy, Kaplana George, Randi H Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lane v. Brigham & Women's Hospital, et al
as 23-1879
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUANITA LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL and CARMEN ADELUTA VESBIANU, MD
Lane v. Boston Children's Hospital, et al
as 23-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUANITA LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, SARAH SCHLEGEL, PHA Doctor and TAMARA, HIV/AIDS Specialist
Lane v. Brigham & Women's Hospital, et al
as 23-1878
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUANITA LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL, KAPLAN GEORGE WECELLEY BECEN, JACKIE SUTTON-WILSON and others
Lane v. Boston Public Schools, et al
as 23-1877
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUANITA LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS, DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. K-8 SCHOOL, SCHOOLS TECHBOSTON ACADEMY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
