Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv04847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mohamed El-Hewie v. Bergen County, et al
as 08-4900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMED F. EL-HEWIE
Defendant - Appellee:
BERGEN COUNTY, BD OF ED OF THE BERGEN COUNTY VOCATIONAL SCHOOL DIST, DENNIS MCNERNEY, Bergen County Executive and others
NJ Protection and Advocacy Inc, et al v. NJ Dept of Ed, et al
as 08-8059
Defendant - Petitioner:
NJ DEPT OF ED, NJ BD OF EDUCATION and LUCILLE E. DAVY
Defendant:
ARNOLD G. HYNDMAN, ARCELIO APONTE, RONALD K. BUTCHER and others
Plaintiff - Respondent:
NJ PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY INC, ED LAW CTR, STATEWIDE PARENT ADVOCACY NETWORK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv04086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NEW JERSEY PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY, INC. et al v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et al
as 3:2007cv02978
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY, INC., Education Law Center, STATEWIDE PARENT ADVOCACY NETWORK OF NEW JERSEY and others
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, LUCILLE E. DAVY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION et al v. DAVY et al
as 3:2007cv00968
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON, MAYOR AND TOWNSHIP COUNCIL OF WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP and others
Defendant:
LUCILLE E. DAVY, LUCILLE E. DAVY, NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
