Cases 1 - 10 of 11
JOHNSON v. CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00113
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC.
Plaintiff:
LUCIOUS JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC.
as 2:2018cv05518
Defendant:
CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC.
Plaintiff:
LUCIOUS JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03755
Defendant:
City of New York, John Does 1-10 and Detective Lucious Johnson
Plaintiff:
Malika Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03738
Defendant:
City of New York and Det. Lucious Johnson
Plaintiff:
Malika Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cole v. City of New York
as 13-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Owen Cole
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Detective Lucious Johnson and Police Officer John Doe, 1-10
Hodja v. Johnson et al
as 1:2013cv00552
Plaintiff:
Kismet Hodja
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 and Police Officer Lucious Johnson
Interested Party:
Office of the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Horvath v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv06005
Defendant:
Detective Mike Civil, Detective Lucious Johnson, Police Officers Jane/John Doe(s) and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Horvath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv00452
Defendant:
City of New York, Tammye Deas, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cole v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv05308
Plaintiff:
Owen Cole
Defendant:
The City of New York, Lucious Johnson and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glasgow v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv04520
Plaintiff:
Dannell Glasgow
Defendant:
The City of New York, Lucious Johnson, Undercover Officer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
