Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Guerra v. Truck One, Inc et al
as 5:2021cv00004
Plaintiff:
LUIS GUERRA
Defendant:
Breea A Davis and Truck One, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1.479 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2020cv00279
Defendant:
AMEIDA SALINAS, STARR COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR, LILIA GUERRA RIOJAS a/k/a LILIA GUERRA, NINFA MIRELES and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Ajay Gaalla, et al v. Citizens Medical Center, et al
as 10-41332
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AJAY GAALLA, Medical Doctor, HARISH CHANDNA, Medical Doctor and DAKSHESH KUMAR PARIKH, Medical Doctor
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID P. BROWN, DONALD DAY, JOE BLAND and others
Roberto Guerra v. B. Bement, et al
as 10-50906
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERTO LUIS GUERRA
Defendant - Appellee:
B. BEMENT, Warden, PROCTER, Assistant Warden, JACKSON, Deputy Warden and others
Ajay Gaalla, et al v. Citizens Medical Center, et al
as 10-40246
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AJAY GAALLA, Medical Doctor, HARISH CHANDNA, Medical Doctor and DAKSHESH KUMAR PARIKH, Medical Doctor
Defendant - Appellant:
CITIZENS MEDICAL CENTER, DAVID P. BROWN, DONALD DAY and others
Gaalla et al v. Citizens Medical Center et al
as 6:2010cv00014
Defendant:
Citizens Medical Center , David P. Brown , Donald Day and others
Plaintiff:
Ajay Gaalla , Harish Chandna and Dakshesh "Kumar&quo Parikh
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Guerra v. Bement et al
as 5:2009cv00784
Plaintiff:
Roberto Luis Guerra
Defendant:
B. Bement, G. Rodriguez, F/N/U Procter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Guerra
as 07-20702
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS LUIS GUERRA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
