Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Yeager v. Widdal et al
as 2:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Duane Robert Yeager
Defendant:
Mitzie Widdal, Kenneth Trivitt, Sgt McGinnis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lunsford v. Weatherford et al
as 3:2021cv00744
Plaintiff:
Reshawn Monta Lunsford
Defendant:
Sonny Weatherford, Sumner County Employees, Jerry Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yeager v. Widdal et al
as 2:2021cv00112
Plaintiff:
Duane Yeager
Defendant:
Mitzie Widdal, Kenneth Trivitt, Sgt McGinnis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 2:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
George M Cook
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Francheska Shown, Dextar Lunsford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lunsford v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv01434
Petitioner:
Terrance Lunsford
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lunsford v. Hall et al
as 3:2016cv00625
Defendant:
Darien Hall, Davidson County, Tennessee, Davidson County Sheriff Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Harold D. Lunsford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacy v. Carter County Sheriff's Office et al (ASH)
as 2:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Lacy
Defendant:
Carter County Sheriff's Office, Dexter Lunsford and Brian Fritts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Jones v. Warden Ross Correctional Inst, et al
as 14-3303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN ROSS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ROB JEFFREYS, Warden, Ross Correctional Inst. Warden, LUNSFORD, Lt. and others
Lunsford v. United States of America
as 3:2014cv00874
Petitioner:
Devonte Lunsford
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Damron v. Donald et al
as 1:2013cv00565
Plaintiff:
Tracy Damron
Defendant:
Morgan Donald, Sgt. Baine, CO Salsbary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
