Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ADORERS OF THE BLOOD OF CHRIST, UNITED STATES PROVINCE v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION et al
as 5:2017cv03163
Plaintiff:
ADORERS OF THE BLOOD OF CHRIST, UNITED STATES PROVINCE , DANI BROUGHT , MARY ALAN WURTH and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION , CHERYL A. LAFLEUR and TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Movant:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
FUHS et al v. MCLACHLAN DRILLING COMPANY et al
as 2:2016cv00376
Plaintiff:
ERIC FUHS , JEFFREY BAILEY , WILLIAMS LAFLEUR and others
Defendant:
MCLACHLAN DRILLING COMPANY and JAMES E. MCLACHLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ALEXANDER et al v. THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv01923
Plaintiff:
CHARLES F. ALEXANDER, JR. , GREGORY LOUIS LAFLEUR and LAMAR LAVANTHA LATHON
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAFLEUR v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48948
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. LAFLEUR
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LAFLEUR v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv52912
Plaintiff:
EDGAR LAFLEUR
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LAFLEUR v. A C & S, INC.
as 2:2010cv84858
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. LAFLEUR
Defendant:
A C & S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAFLEUR v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv56923
Plaintiff:
ROLAND J. LAFLEUR
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LAFLEUR v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv54456
Plaintiff:
RODNEY J. LAFLEUR
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LAFLEUR v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52448
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL S. LAFLEUR
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LAFLEUR v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51327
Plaintiff:
WARREN LAFLEUR
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
