Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Rose Court, LLC v. Select Portfolio Servicing, In, et al
as 21-16663
Appellant: ROSE COURT, LLC
Appellee: SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION and U.S. BANK, N.A., successor trustee to Bank of America, NA, successor in interest to LaSalle Bank NA, as trustee, on behalf of the holders of the WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-HY7, its assignees and/or successors
Heidi Lobstein, et al v. Washington Mutual Mortgage Pas, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-55998
Defendant / Appellee: PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI, CITY OF TALLAHASSEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES WMALT SERIES 2007-OC1, Erroneously Sued As US Bank National Association as Trustee, successor in interest to Bank of America, National Association as successor by merger to Lasalle Bank NA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: HEIDI M. LOBSTEIN and MARGUERITE DESELMS
US Bank NA et al v. Trina R Lobo
as 2:2019cv10612
Defendant: Trina R Lobo, Trina R. Patterson and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Plaintiff: US BANK NA, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO BANK OF AMERICA, NA. SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO LASALLE BANK NA, AS TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF THE HOLDERS OF THE WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, WMALT and US Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Richard Hill v. U.S. Bank N.A., et al
as 19-56014
Defendant / Appellee: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON, NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION, U.S. BANK N.A., as trustee, successor ininterest to Lasalle Bank NA, as trustee on behalf of the holders of the Wamu Mortgage pass-through certificates, series 2007-0A46 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD W. HILL
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Eagle Investors, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-16566
Not Yet Classified: U.S. BANK, N.A., Successor Trustee to Bank of America, NA, Successor in Interest to LaSalle Bank, NA, as Trustee, on Behalf of the Holders of the Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, WMALT Series 2007-OA5 and EAGLE INVESTORS
Defendant / Appellee: RED ROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC and SHADOW SPRINGS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
Spesock et al v. U.S. Bank NA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00092
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Spesock and Janet Spesock
Defendant: U.S. Bank, NA , Bank of America, NA , LaSalle Bank, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neal v. U.S. Bank, NA, Successor Trustee to Bank of America, NA, Successor In Interest To Lasalle Bank, NA, As Trustee, On Behalf of the WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-OA6 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv06471
Plaintiff: Ralph B. Neal
Defendant: U.S. Bank, NA, Successor Trustee to Bank of America, NA, Successor In Interest To Lasalle Bank, NA, As Trustee, On Behalf of the WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-OA6 and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank, National Associatio v. Henry Varela, Jr.
as 17-15046
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee: U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Bank of America, National Association as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank NA as Trustee for Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WMALT Series 2006-5
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant: HENRY A. VARELA, Jr.
U.S. Bank, National Associatio v. Henry Varela, Jr.
as 17-15046
Counter Claimant: HENRY A. VARELA, Jr.
Plaintiff: U.S. BANK, as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Bank of America, National Association as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank NA as Trustee for Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WMALT Series 2006-5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-55010
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?