Cases 1 - 10 of 33
LACY v. TENN CIVIL RULE 15G THIRD PARTY et al
as 1:2022cv03537
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH LACY
Defendant:
TENN CIVIL RULE 15G THIRD PARTY, DAVE RAMSEY, APPELLATE COURT OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LACY v. TENN CIVIL RULE 15G THIRD PARTY et al
as 1:2022cv02858
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH LACY
Defendant:
TENN CIVIL RULE 15G THIRD PARTY, DAVE RAMSEY, APPELLANT APPEAL COURT OF MIDDLE TN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LACY v. REYNOLDS et al
as 1:2022cv02421
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH LACY
Defendant:
SARA REYNOLDS, ASHLEY LIPTON, APPELLATE APPEALS COURT MIDDLE TN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LACY v. RAMSEY et al
as 1:2022cv02417
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH LACY
Defendant:
DAVE RAMSEY, STATE OF TENNESSEE and APPELATE COURT OF APPEALS OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LACY v. ORTEGA et al
as 1:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT LACY
Defendant:
MARIA LAURA ORTEGA and WEICHERT REALTORS
USOYAN et al v. REPUBLIC OF TURKEY
as 1:2018cv01141
Plaintiff:
LUSIK USOYAN , JOHN DOE I , LACY MACAULEY and others
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF TURKEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
ENGLISH v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv02534
Petitioner:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA and others
Amicus Curiae:
STENY HOYER, BRAD SHERMAN, ELIZABETH WARREN and others
Defendant:
JOHN MICHAEL MULVANEY, DONALD JOHN TRUMP and DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
LEANDRA ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CUMMINGS et al v. HORNE
as 1:2017cv02308
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS , CAROLYN MALONEY , ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON and others
Defendant:
TIMOTHY O. HORNE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
PULPHUS et al v. AYERS
as 1:2017cv00310
Plaintiff:
DAVID PULPHUS and WILLIAM LACY CLAY
Defendant:
STEPHEN T. AYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RATTLER v. USA
as 1:2017cv00152
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CLYDE LACY RATTLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
