Cases 1 - 10 of 587
Matchen v. Araya
as 1:2024cv02162
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Matchen
Defendant:
Rodrigo Araya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Weems v. Telfair State Prison et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Cetery Lamar Weems
Defendant:
Telfair State Prison and Ware State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADDOX v. MIMS et al
as 5:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL LAMAR MADDOX
Defendant:
CHARLES MIMS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Maddux
as 1:2024cv01443
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weems v. Telfair State Prison et al
as 1:2024cv01235
Plaintiff:
Cetery Lamar Weems
Defendant:
Telfair State Prison and Ware State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ADAMS
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
MARCUS LAMAR BROWN
Respondent:
ROBERT ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
