Cases 1 - 10 of 51
WHITFIELD v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04422
Petitioner:
ROBERT LAMAR WHITFIELD
Respondent:
WARDEN RENEE THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FIELDS v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2022cv06915
Petitioner:
LAMAR G. FIELDS and LOMONT FIELDS
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. AVILEZ et al
as 2:2022cv05943
Plaintiff:
JEROME LAMAR YOUNG
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILEZ, MICHAEL LNU and HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2022cv05222
Plaintiff:
JEROME LAMAR YOUNG
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.O.C. and RICHARD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. MATTHEWS
as 1:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LAMAR JOHNSON
Defendant:
MARCUS MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL et al v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
MIKAL S. MITCHELL, KAL SHAREEF EL, SERGIO ROSADO and others
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY, DAVID KELSEY, ARAMARK CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEST v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv10907
Plaintiff:
LAMAR WEST
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv08463
Defendant:
JODY HIRATA, DR. ALAN DIAS and RICHARD SMITH
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND LAMAR BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARCHIE et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv07907
Defendant:
JODY HIRATA, RICHARD SMITH and CHARLES WARREN
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ARCHIE, SR., RAYMOND LAMAR BROWN, JOHN CLARK and others
Interested Party:
TARA D. SIMMONS-ARCHIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. BRAGG
as 2:2019cv18576
Respondent:
Warden TRAVIS BRAGG
Petitioner:
LAMAR SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
