Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Hall v. Wilkinson et al
as 5:2015cv00203
Petitioner:
Randy Lamar Hall
Respondent:
Tim Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sullivan v. Rios
as 5:2015cv00067
Petitioner:
Delma Lamar Sullivan
Respondent:
H A Rios, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeffries et al v. Forsythe et al
as 5:2014cv01433
Plaintiff:
Lamar Howard Jeffries, David Barksdale, Demetrias Kelly and others
Defendant:
Eric Forsythe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. United States of America
as 5:2014cv00909
Movant:
Leonardo Lamar Parks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rogers v. United States of America
as 5:2013cv00369
Movant:
Jupiter Lamar Rogers
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hobby Lobby Stores Inc et al v. Sebelius et al
as 5:2012cv01000
Plaintiff:
Hobby Lobby Stores Inc , Mardel Inc , David Green and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , United States Department of Health and Human Services , Hilda Solis and others
Amicu:
Orrin G Hatch , Daniel R Coats , Thad Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Covington v. United States of America
as 5:2012cv00998
Movant:
Tueshemba Lamar Covington
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rogers v. United States of America
as 5:2010cv00290
Movant:
Jupiter Lamar Rogers
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Davis v. Citty et al
as 5:2007cv01375
Plaintiff:
Dupree Lamar Davis
Defendant:
Bill Citty, Oklahoma City, City of and Ryan Scweitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
