Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States v. Smith
as 24-6000
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DARRICK LAMONT SMITH, AKA William Louis McCollum, AKA Derrick Lamonte Smith, AKA Smith Derrick, AKA Darrick Laster, AKA Derrick Lamont Laster, AKA Damerio S. Lassiter, AKA Mario Fisher, AKA Lassiter S. Deama, AKA Lassiter S. Deamma, AKA Marcus Dewany
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Accommodations)
Tucker v. Smith et al
as 1:2019cv02402
Defendant:
Stephen Frankel, Omid Jazaeri, Brock Borderline and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda D. Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker Meuse v. Epps-McElroy et al
as 1:2019cv00837
Defendant:
C (I) Lamont Smith, Donald (I) Lefkowits, C Lamont Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda D. Tucker Meuse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Draper City et al
as 2:2017cv00772
Plaintiff:
Troy Martinez
Defendant:
Draper City , Draper Community Foundation, Troy Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of Oklahoma City, et al
as 16-6153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LAMONT SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, Criminal Court, A. J. LEWIS, BILL CITTY and others
Smith v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2016cv00555
Plaintiff:
Michael Lamont Smith
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of, A J Lewis, Bill Citty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barker v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2009cv00619
Plaintiff:
Lauren Barker
Defendant:
Scott Stephenson, Bud E. Cox, Tom Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Ward et al
as 5:2007cv00413
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lamont Smith
Defendant:
Ron Ward, Lenora Jordan, Bill Monday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
