Cases 1 - 10 of 18
LaShawn Johnson v. Eric Trivit, et al
as 22-5601
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LASHAWN LAMONT JOHNSON
Defendant:
ERIC TRIVIT, Captain, RONNIE KENT, Lieutenant, UNKNOWN NORTON, Sergeant and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN MCGINNIS, Sergeant, ZACHARY HARRIS, Corrections Officer and STEVEN TIPTON, Corrections Officer
Johnson v. Laurel County Detention Facility
as 3:2022cv00133
Petitioner:
LaShawn Lamont Johnson
Respondent:
Laurel County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Laurel County Detention Facility
as 2:2021cv00157
Petitioner:
LaShawn Lamont Johnson
Respondent:
Laurel County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2020cv12791
Defendant:
Tyler Nagy, Raul Martinez and City of Detroit
Plaintiff:
Lamont Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Trivit et al
as 2:2020cv00099
Defendant:
Stg McGinnis, Dr Harris, Captain E. Trivit and others
Plaintiff:
LaShawn Lamont Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2019cv00174
Plaintiff:
John Boatfield, Bruce Smiley, Lamont Johnson and others
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, State of Tennessee, Tennessee Board of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Buncombe Co. N.C. et al
as 3:2018cv00179
Plaintiff:
LaShawn Lamont Johnson and Bradley A. Thomas
Defendant:
Buncombe Co. N.C., Walter D. Cum, Jr., Tenn. Board of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olmstead v. Parker et al
as 3:2017cv00553
Plaintiff:
Phillip David Olmstead
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Warden Settles, Warden Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Settles
as 1:2017cv01195
Petitioner:
Lamont Johnson
Respondent:
Darren Settles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
