Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Tom v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2022cv00061
Petitioner:
Lane Charlie Tom
Respondent:
State of Nevada and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. State of Nevada
as 3:2022cv00024
Petitioner:
Michael V Lane
Respondent:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodrum v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron D. Ford, Churchill County Clerks Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Helmbrecht v. Henderson Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv01357
Plaintiff:
Ricky Helmbrecht
Defendant:
Henderson Police Department, City of Henderson, Police Chief Thedrick Andres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lane v. Clark County Detention Center
as 2:2021cv01305
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Lane, Sr.
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cleveland Hills Endowment, Inc. v. Flores et al
as 2:2021cv01207
Defendant:
Elizabeth Polanco, Shelba Ketchum, Norberto Frustocki and others
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Hills Endowment, Inc. and Timothy Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00213
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Park Lane-Reno Partners, LLC v. Syufy Enterprises
as 3:2020cv00596
Defendant:
Syufy Enterprises
Plaintiff:
Park Lane-Reno Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goodrum v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2020cv00541
Defendant:
Lane Mills, Churchill County District Attorney's Office, Charles Woodman and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodrum v. Churchill County et al
as 3:2020cv00538
Defendant:
Lane Mills, Sue Savon, Churchill, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
