Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Montague et al v. Schofield et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00292
Plaintiff: Charles Montague, Derrick Payne, Christopher Hamilton and others
Defendant: Centurion, Georgia Crowell, Bill Haslam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Warwick et al
as 3:2013cv00202
Plaintiff: Anton Tamir Mason
Defendant: Tonya Warwick and Melvin Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schaffer v. Tennessee Department of Corrections
as 3:2012cv00192
Plaintiff: Harold Bernard Schaffer
Defendant: Tennessee Department of Corrections, Derrick Schofield, Ruben Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Lane et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00019
Plaintiff: Kenneth Hall
Defendant: Edmund Lane and Mary Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2012cv00007
Plaintiff: Romalis Gray
Defendant: Tennessee Department of Correction, Morgan County Correctional Complex, J Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramon v. Lane et al
as 2:2011cv02522
Plaintiff: Luis Ramon
Defendant: Robert Lane and Braden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Osborne We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv02094
Movant: Bernardo C. Lane
Respondent: David R. Osborne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Godwin v. Muller et al
as 2:2010cv02743
Plaintiff: Cordarius Godwin
Defendant: Muller and Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Sams
as 3:2010cv00371
Plaintiff: Randy D Lane
Defendant: Steven Edward Sams, Esq
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Clarksville Police Dept. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00003
Plaintiff: Cedric R. Mitchell
Defendant: Clarksville Police Dept. and Daniel Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?