Cases 1 - 7 of 7
LANKFORD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv06838
Plaintiff:
LAUREN LANKFORD
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
REIMER v. UNITED STATES SENATE et al
as 2:2021cv10997
Defendant:
BEN SASSE, SUSAN COLLINS, MIKE ROUNDS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J REIMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
LANKFORD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv07168
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Plaintiff:
LORA LANKFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANKFORD v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2018cv09617
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER LANKFORD
Defendant:
PFIZER INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANKFORD v. CITY OF CLIFTON, et al
as 2:2018cv06643
Plaintiff:
JAQUICE LANKFORD
Defendant:
CITY OF CLIFTON, CLIFTON POLICE DEPARTMENT , ALAN ALAN FIORILLA and others
Cross_claimant:
ALAN ALAN FIORILLA , CLIFTON POLICE DEPARTMENT , JUAN VELEZ and others
Cross_defendant:
ALAN ALAN FIORILLA , THOMAS BUELL, JUAN VELEZ and others
Counter_claimant:
ALAN ALAN FIORILLA , CLIFTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and JUAN VELEZ
Counter_defendant:
JAQUICE LANKFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: VERIZON WIRELESS DATA CHARGES LITIGATION
as 3:2010cv01749
Plaintiff:
DERICK BRIAN MOORE , MICHELLE BUTZ , JOHN M. RENNAR and others
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP and DONNA HEATON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
BAKER v. WITTEVRONGEL et al
as 2:2008cv00301
Plaintiff:
RALPH BAKER
Defendant:
RALPH WITTEVRONGEL, UNION POLICE DEPT., EDWARD CHABEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
