Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Richard Frederick Lappin, Sr v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv02311
Defendant:
3M Company, The, EIDP Inc, Du Pont De Nemours Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Frederick Lappin, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Vance v. Holder et al
as 6:2011cv03460
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Vance
Defendant:
Eric H Holder, Jr, Harold Lappin, John Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURGESS v. LAPPIN
as 2:2011cv02074
Petitioner:
Albert C Burgess, Jr
Respondent:
Harley Lappin and Warden Marianna FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holmes v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 2:2011cv00287
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Holmes
Defendant:
Harvey G Lappin, Darlene Drew, Tovia Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Lappin et al
as 2:2010cv03271
Plaintiff:
Mark A Thomas
Defendant:
Harold Lappin, MM Mitchell and Rosario Fuerte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Lappin et al
as 8:2010cv03271
Plaintiff:
Mark A Thomas
Defendant:
Harold Lappin, MM Mitchell and Rosario Fuerte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2010cv01968
Plaintiff:
Donald H Jenkins
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Creech v. Drew et al
as 0:2010cv00108
Plaintiff:
Billy Eugene Creech
Defendant:
Darlene Drew, Mitch Huffman and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Benavides v. Lappin et al
as 2:2009cv02996
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Benavides
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, R Holt, Mary Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Benavides v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2009cv02798
Petitioner:
Eduardo Benavides
Respondent:
Mary Mitchell and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
