Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Brown v. Chandler et al
as 5:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
Adrian Lamar Brown
Defendant:
Larry Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Breshear et al
as 3:2013cv00386
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Defendant:
Steve Breshear, J. Michael Brown, LaDonna H. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Chandler
as 5:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
Darnell Perkins
Defendant:
Larry Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Froman, et al v. Kentucky Department of Correct, et al
as 11-5868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE M. FROMAN, ERIC L. HERMANSEN and JAMES CLAWSON
Plaintiff:
DALE SCHWIEMAN, JAMES W. STEADMAN and MARK H. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, In it's Agency Capacity, LADONNA THOMPSON, Commissioner of KDOC in her Individual and Official Capacity, LARRY CHANDLER, Warden of the Kentucky State Reformatory in his Individual and Official capacity and others
David Ward v. Kentucky State Reformatory, et al
as 11-5776
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ALLEN WARD
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE REFORMATORY, LARRY CHANDLER, JOHN WRIGHT, Deputy Warden and others
William Walker v. John Minton, et al
as 11-5583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM B. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MINTON, LARRY CHANDLER, KAREN CONRAD and others
Kelly Miller v. Larry Chandler
as 11-5468
Petitioner - Appellant:
KELLY FRANK MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY CHANDLER, Warden
Ellis v. Chandler et al
as 1:2011cv01006
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Allen Ellis
Defendant:
Larry Chandler and David Talley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edsel Hale v. Larry Chandler
as 11-5034
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDSEL E. HALE
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY CHANDLER, Warden
Ellis v. Chandler et al
as 1:2010cv01080
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Allen Ellis
Defendant:
Larry Chandler, David - Butler, David Talley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
