Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Clark v. Mangham
as 24-30568
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Clark
Defendant:
Charles McBride, Mangham Hardy Rolfs & Abadie, Terrence J. Donahue, Sr. and others
Clark et al v. Mangham et al
as 5:2024cv00770
Defendant:
Gregory C Weiss, Donald E Walter, Stephen R Barry and others
Plaintiff:
L & M Hair Care Products Inc, Larry E Clark and Mrs Larry E Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Clark v. Edwards
as 22-30706
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry E. Clark, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
John B. Edwards, Governor, State of Louisiana, Shawn D. Wilson, Secretary for the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Charles D. McBride, Administrator for the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development and others
Clark v. Edwards
as 22-30530
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry E. Clark, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
John B. Edwards, Governor, State of Louisiana, Shawn D. Wilson, Secretary for the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Charles D. McBride, Administrator for the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development and others
Clark v. Edwards et al
as 3:2021cv00177
Defendant:
Andrew G. Barry, Terrence J. Donahue, Jr., Jay B. McCallum and others
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Clark, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Clark v. Frederico Pena, et al
as 14-30389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY E. CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
FREDERICO PENA, Secretary of United States Department of Transportation, RODNEY SALTER, Administrator of United States Department of Transportation, FRANK DENTON, Secretary of Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development and others
Larry Clark v. Frederico Pena, et al
as 11-30724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY E CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
FREDERICO PENA, Secretary of United States Department of Transportation, RODNEY SALTER, Administrator of United States Department of Transportation, FRANK DENTON, Secretary of Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
