Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Tasha Royster v. Larry Robinson, et al
as 20-14877
Defendant / Appellee:
KELVIN LAWSON, in his official capacity as Chairman Florida A&M University, ELMIRA MANGUM, in her individual capacity, LARRY ROBINSON, in his official capacity as President Florida A&M University and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TASHA ROYSTER
Magee v. Board of Trustee of Florida A&M University et al
as 6:2019mc00038
Plaintiff:
Charles Magee
Defendant:
Larry Robinson, Board of Trustee of Florida A&M University and Robert Taylor
Interested Party:
Orange Legal, Inc.
In re: Larry Robinson
as 16-14137
Petitioner:
In re: LARRY ROBINSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Larry Robinson
as 16-12407
Petitioner:
In re: LARRY ROBINSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ROBINSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as NJ/3:13-cv-04130
Plaintiff:
GRACIE M. ROBINSON and LARRY ROBINSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Smith et al v. Green et al
as 4:2012cv06088
Plaintiff:
Alice Smith , Dorothy Mendenhall , Ellissteen Owens and others
Defendant:
Johanthan Green, June Jackson, Pamela Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Robinson et al v. Washington Mutual Bank et al
as 4:2012cv03084
Plaintiff:
Larry Robinson and Mable Regina J Robinson
Defendant:
Washington Mutual Bank and Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Robinson v. Tucker
as 2:2012cv02200
Plaintiff:
Larry Robinson
Defendant:
Scott A. Tucker
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Richard C. Vickerman VS The Department of Housing and Urban Development, et al.
as 3:2003cv00222
:
Accessible Space Inc.
Defendant:
James M. Bixler, Department of Housing & Urban Development, Las Vegas Housing Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 -36
Larry Robinson v. General Electric Co., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-64034
Defendant:
General Electric Co
Plaintiff:
Larry Robinson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
