Cases
Ronald Newton v. Latasha Joseph
as 18-40606
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD E. NEWTON
Defendant - Appellee: LATASHA JOSEPH, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Correctional Officer, In Their Individual and Official Capacities
Ronald Newton v. Latasha Joseph, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-41078
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD E. NEWTON
Defendant - Appellee: LATASHA JOSEPH, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, In Their Individual and Official Capacities, DAVE PILLE, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Library Supervisor, In Their Individual and Official Capacities, VICKY BARROW, Assistant Manager, In Their Individual and Official Capacities and others
Stacy Conner v. William Stephens, Director, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-40324
Plaintiff - Appellant: STACY L. CONNER
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, MICHAEL A. ROESLER, Head Warden Stiles Unit, DARREN B. WALLACE, Assistant Warden Stiles Unit and others
Newton v. Joseph et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00320
Plaintiff: Ronald E Newton
Defendant: Latasha Joseph, Dave Pille, Vicky Barrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newton v. Joseph We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00551
Plaintiff: Ronald E Newton
Defendant: Latasha Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Stephen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00498
Plaintiff: Stacy L Conner
Defendant: William Stephen, Michael A Roesler, Darren B Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newton v. Joseph et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00510
Plaintiff: Ronald E Newton
Defendant: Latasha Joseph, Dave Pille, Vicky Barrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?