Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Young v. Bryan Collier et al
as 4:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Marvin Young
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Amber K. Ochoa, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thigpen v. GEO Reentry, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv02773
Defendant:
GEO Reentry, Inc., GEO Reentry Services, LLC, The Geo Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Thigpen, Willie Miller, Jesse Lozano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disability Law Claims, P.A. d/b/a Lavan & Neidenberg, P.A. et al v. IM Solutions, LLC
as 4:2015mc00064
Plaintiff:
Disability Law Claims, P.A. d/b/a Lavan & Neidenberg, P.A. and Case Ghost, Inc.
Defendant:
IM Solutions, LLC
Alexander v. Crozier et al
as 1:2015cv00544
Plaintiff:
Cyd Lavan Alexander
Defendant:
Det. C. Crozier, M. Fickel, J. Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. Thaler
as 4:2012cv02846
Petitioner:
Adrain Lavan Lindsey
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steptoe v. Adams
as 2:2011cv00084
Plaintiff:
Monzelle Lavan Steptoe
Defendant:
NFN Grant and Deborah K Aleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kearse v. Thaler
as 5:2010cv00105
Petitioner:
Eddie Lavan Kearse
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lindsey v. Matzke et al
as 4:2009cv03967
Plaintiff:
Adrian Lavan Lindsey, Sr
Defendant:
Amanda Matzke and Marc Hamlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bullard et al v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company et al
as 1:2008cv00724
Plaintiff:
John G. Alexander, Clarence Edward Batts, Sr., Elnora Bell and others
Defendant:
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, Dow Chemical Company, Koppers Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
