Cases 1 - 10 of 10
In re: Curtis Baker
as 21-1349
Petitioner:
In re: CURTIS LAVERNE BAKER
Respondent:
CONNIE HORTON, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00029
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Wallace Jones, Jr. v. The Florida Department of Chil, et al
as 14-15188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALLACE C. JONES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES - AGENCY, ANNE MARIE JOSEPH, MEDGTH EUGENE and others
Jones v. Baker et al
as 1:2013cv20084
Plaintiff:
Wallace C. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Lavern Baker and E. Maria Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. The Florida Department of Children And Families - Agency et al
as 1:2012cv24503
Plaintiff:
Wallace C. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
The Florida Department of Children And Families - Agency, Anne Marie Joseph, Medgth Eugene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wallace Jones, Jr. v. Lavern Baker, et al
as 12-16415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALLACE C. JONES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LAVERN BAKER and E. MARIA BROWN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv06685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jones v. Florida Department of Children and Families
as 1:2010cv22043
Plaintiff:
Wallace C. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Florida Department of Children and Families, Lavern Baker and E. Maria Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Century 21 Real Estate LLC et al v. Baker
as 3:2007cv00723
Plaintiff:
Century 21 Real Estate LLC, Century 21 Real Estate LLC, C21 TM Corp and others
Defendant:
Lavern Baker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Century 21 Real Estate LLC et al v. Baker
as 5:2007cv00723
Plaintiff:
Century 21 Real Estate LLC and C21 TM Corp
Defendant:
Lavern Baker
Mediator:
Timothy E. Carr
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
