Cases 1 - 10 of 2,808
Paltzer Private Clients Law v. Espy Hejailan-Amon
as 1:2024cv03584
Plaintiff:
Paltzer Private Clients Law
Defendant:
Tracey Espy Hejailan-Amon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ruderman v. Law Office of Yuriy Prakhin, P.C.
as 24-1186
Plaintiff:
YELENA RUDERMAN
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF YURIY PRAKHIN, P.C. and YURIY PRAKHIN, in both his individual and professional capacities
Lee v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 24-1159
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM, JAMAL PESARAN and others
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and MORGAN STANLEY
Pal v. Tallberg et al
as 3:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
Neelu Pal
Defendant:
James N Tallberg, Andrew J Glass, Patrick D Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. City of New York
as 24-1051
Plaintiff:
EON THOMPSON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, BILL DE BLASIO, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Mayor of New York City, CYNTHIA BRANN, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Commissioner of Correction and others
Pyne et al v. CKR Law LLP et al
as 1:2024cv02912
Plaintiff:
Dr. Keith E. Pyne and Enrico Desiata
Defendant:
CKR Law LLP and Jeffrey Rinde
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
UC Solutions, LLC v. Shapiro
as 24-991
Plaintiff:
UC SOLUTIONS, LLC, GP TRADING PARTNERS, LLC and PROTECTIVE APPAREL, LLP
Defendant:
SAADIA SHAPIRO, VADIM LEYBEL, BORIS LEYBEL and others
Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital
as 24-954
Plaintiff:
NELLA MANKO
Defendant:
LENOX HILL HOSPITAL, DANA A. MANNOR, M.D., NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM and others
Walton v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 24-917
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH WALTON
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., JAMIE DIMON, in his individual capacity, CODOLIS LAW and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
