Cases filed in Michigan
Cases 1 - 10 of 580
Florence Rostami Law LLC v. Mitsuiya Industries Co., Ltd.
as 2:2024cv11123
Plaintiff: Florence Rostami Law LLC
Defendant: Mitsuiya Industries Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10895
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rahaman [E-filer] v. Boedeker Law P.C.
as 2:2024cv10825
Plaintiff: Joy Rahaman [E-filer]
Defendant: Boedeker Law P.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10765
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10768
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
London v. River Rouge PD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv10754
Plaintiff: Randall Tremayne London
Defendant: River Rouge PD, Barton Morris Law Firm and Wayne, County of
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00267
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dobronski v. Labovick & Labovick, P.A.
as 4:2024cv10561
Plaintiff: Mark W. Dobronski
Defendant: Labovick & Labovick, P.A. Doing business as Labovick Law Group
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Simpson-Tuegel et al v. White, et al
as 1:2024cv00169
Plaintiff: Michelle Simpson-Tuegel and The Simpson Tuegel Law Firm, PLLC
Defendant: White Law, PLLC and James White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harvey et al v. Citi Group Mortgage et al
as 4:2024cv10073
Plaintiff: Eric Harvey and Lela McGee-Harvey
Defendant: Citi Group Mortgage, Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC and Trott Law Firm

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?