Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Histories Antiques & Collectables v. Horace Samuel Parker Jr. Rev Trust et al
as 2:2024cv02038
Plaintiff:
Histories Antiques & Collectables doing business as Brian D. DuBuc
Defendant:
Horace Samuel Parker Jr. Rev Trust, David A & Kimberly Parker, Gaither Law and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Reppy et al v. Cenlar FSB Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv05227
Plaintiff:
John Reppy and Karen Reppy
Defendant:
Cenlar FSB Inc., CitiMortgage, Inc. and Mickel Law Firm, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Logan v. Cox et al
as 2:2022cv02187
Plaintiff:
Glicenia Carmela Logan
Defendant:
James O Cox, P.K. Holmes, III, David Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Taylor v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc et al
as 4:2021cv00296
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing Inc, US Bank National Association, Marinosci Law Group Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Felicia D Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
USA v. Flack et al
as 1:2011cv00006
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Melvin J Flack, Karan Y Flack, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Cravens et al v. New Century Mortgage Company et al
as 4:2010cv01511
Plaintiff:
Jonathan C Cravens and Thressa Cravens
Defendant:
New Century Mortgage Company, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc , Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Cortez et al v. S N Servicing et al
as 4:2009cv00057
Plaintiff:
ChanDra Lyons Cortez and Cornelio Cortez
Defendant:
S N Servicing and Shaprio & Kirsch Law Firm
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bone v. HSBC Mortgage Services Inc et al
as 4:2009cv00041
Plaintiff:
Debora A Bone
Defendant:
HSBC Mortgage Services Inc, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Lender and Lender's and others
Movant:
Kathleen McClain
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
