Cases 1 - 10 of 3,220
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tingle v. Defilippis
as 4:2024cv02543
Plaintiff:
Aaron Kristopher Tingle
Defendant:
Steve Defilippis and Law Office of Picone and Defilippis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Guzman Vela v. Medeles et al
as 1:2024at00335
Plaintiff:
Daniel Guzman Vela
Defendant:
Rey Medeles, Gustavo Gutierrez, Unknown Law Enforcement Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAW OFFICES OF PHOENIX THOTTAM v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al
as 2:2024cv03220
Plaintiff:
LAW OFFICES OF PHOENIX THOTTAM
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Murphy v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Murphy v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. ZBS Law, LLP et al
as 2:2024cv02342
Plaintiff:
James Clark
Defendant:
ZBS Law, LLP, Legacy Law Group, Flagstar Bank, FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
