Cases 1 - 10 of 73
FTC v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 23-15992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION and ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS, FORMER STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL, JAHNA LINDERMUTH, DOUG PETERSON, HERBERT H. SLATERY III, and JOHN SUTHERS, BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE and others
In re: Mary Carr, et al v. Google LLC, et al
as 23-15285
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GOOGLE PLAY STORE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY CARR, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DIANNE BENTLEY, JENNIFER GRACE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GOOGLE LLC, GOOGLE IRELAND LIMITED, GOOGLE COMMERCE LIMITED and others
Intervenor:
AMAZON.COM LLC
Amicus Curiae:
ATLANTIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION, BUSINESS AND ANTITRUST LAW PROFESSORS and others
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
as 21-16695
Plaintiff:
EPIC GAMES, INC.
Counter Claimant:
APPLE, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
TILE, MATCH GROUP, INC., BASECAMP and others
Arizona Board of Regents v. John Doe, et al
as 21-16525
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, a body corporate, for and on behalf of: on behalf of Arizona State University
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, an individual, AKA asu_covid.parties
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation
Amicus Curiae:
UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW, First Amendment Clinic and INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PROFESSORS
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
as 21-16506
Appellant:
EPIC GAMES, INC.
Counter Claimant:
APPLE, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
38 LAW, ECONOMICS, AND BUSINESS PROFESSORS, TILE, COMMITTEE TO SUPPORT THE ANTITRUST LAWS and others
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv09253
Plaintiff:
Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Amicus Curiae:
Members of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Kids in Need of Defense, Immigration Law Professors and others
Petitioner:
Immigration Equality
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv07721
Defendant:
Mark A Morgan, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham and others
Plaintiff:
Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services and others
Petitioner:
Immigration Equality
Amicus Curiae:
Immigration Legal Services Organizations and Immigration Law Professors
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
NAM, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 20-17132
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL POMPEO, in his official capacity as Secretary of State, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. TECH WORKERS, IMMIGRATION LAW PROFESSORS, LEADING COMPANIES AND BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv09893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
National Association of Manufacturers et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2020cv04887
Plaintiff:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, National Retail Federation, National Association of Manufacturers and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of State, Michael R. Pompeo and others
Amicus Curiae:
WORLDWIDE EMPLOYEE RELOCATION COUNCIL, U.S. Tech Workers, Amici Curiae Leading Companies and Business Organizations and others
Petitioner:
Amici Curiae Additional Companies
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
