Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Jordan v. First et al
as 4:2011cv00106
Petitioner:
Lonnie L. Jordan
Respondent:
Albert First, Lawrence Kelly and Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldman v. Moore et al
as 4:2010cv00082
Plaintiff:
Antonio Goldman
Defendant:
Ruthie Moore, James Brewer and Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siddall v. Kelly et al
as 2:2010cv00081
Petitioner:
Derrick Siddall
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly, Mississippi Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Powers v. Epps et al
as 4:2010cv00057
Plaintiff:
Stephen Elliott Powers
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelly, John Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Epps et al
as 1:2010cv00076
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Campbell
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Lawrence Kelly, Shannon Warnock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivori v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2010cv00008
Plaintiff:
Frank Sivori
Defendant:
Emitt Sparkman, Lawrence Kelly, Darlester Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stafford v. Kelly et al
as 4:2009cv00133
Plaintiff:
Roy Stafford
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly, Emitt L. Sparkman, Gloria Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Epps et al
as 4:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
Robert David Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelly, Patty Legg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Kelly et al
as 1:2009cv00270
Petitioner:
Clarris Turner
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Epps et al
as 4:2009cv00119
Plaintiff:
Stephen Harris
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lanette Jordan, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
