Cases 1 - 10 of 19
PARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv22620
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE PARKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lawrence Parker Hughes v. Bryan D. Phillips
as 5:2023cv01474
Petitioner:
Lawrence Parker Hughes
Respondent:
Bryan D Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Still et al
as 3:2023cv00909
Plaintiff:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Annette M. Still, Melvin Farris, Ethel Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
WITT v. PARKER et al
as 2:2022cv03667
Plaintiff:
MELISSA WITT
Defendant:
LAURENCE PARKER, PROGRESSIVE GARDEN STATE INSURANCE COMPANY and LAWRENCE PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
PARKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16655
Plaintiff:
TYLER LAWRENCE PARKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv49083
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE PARKER
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker v. Fields Jr.
as 1:2020cv00421
Petitioner:
Lawrence Parker
Respondent:
Supt. Leroy Fields Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramon Parker v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 13-14914
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAMON LAWRENCE PARKER
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
BAILEY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2012cv00104
Plaintiff:
CHELSIE BAILEY , JEREMIAH BALDWIN , BLAINE B BALLARD and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lawrence Parker v. Acands, Inc.
as PAE/2:10-CV-60850
Defendant:
Acands, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Parker
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
