Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gary v. Housing-Forward/Intermin-Housing Staff et al
as 1:2023cv04563
Plaintiff:
Theresa Denise Gary
Defendant:
Housing-Forward/Intermin-Housing Staff, Erik Johnson, Armando Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chew v. MoneyGram International, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv07537
Defendant:
Pamela H. Patsley, W. Alexander Holmes, Lawrence Angelilli and others
Plaintiff:
Khong Meng Chew, Jeffrey Shopoff and Norfolk County Retirement System
Petitioner:
Adrian Marcu, Quang Ho, Sally Guangxia Yu and others
Rapai v. Lawry's The Prime Rib, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10546
Plaintiff:
Robin Rapai
Defendant:
Lawry's Restaurants, Inc. and Lawry's The Prime Rib, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Griffith Laboratories, Inc. et al v. Kancor Ingredients Limited et al
as 1:2015cv04391
Plaintiff:
Griffith Laboratories U.S.A., Inc. and Innova
Defendant:
Kancor Ingredients Limited and Balmer Lawrie-Van Leer Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. Lawrie
as 1:2014cv07967
Plaintiff:
Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Clayton Charles Lawrie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. Kocsis Brothers Machine Company et al
as 1:2014cv04316
Defendant:
Kocsis Brothers Machine Company , Kocsis Technologies, Inc. and Louis Kocsis
Plaintiff:
Lawrie Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hakim v. Osborne et al
as 3:2013cv50067
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Drew Hakim
Defendant:
Kenneth Osborne, J. Utley, S. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carothers v. Lawry's The Prime Rib, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv10048
Plaintiff:
Carmella Carothers
Defendant:
Lawry's The Prime Rib, Inc. and Lawry's Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Larson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv05740
Plaintiff:
Grant Charles Larson
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Michael Rothwell, Darlene Bridges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
