Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Lay v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Lisa Carolyn Lay
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Pointer v. Lay et al
as 1:2023cv01803
Plaintiff:
Callie Adalyn Pointer
Defendant:
David Allen Lay, Kirby Scott Clemens and Mason Birkbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pointer v. Lay et al
as 2:2023cv02854
Plaintiff:
Callie Adalyn Pointer
Defendant:
David Allen Lay, Kirby Scott Clemens and Mason Birkbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lay v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02244
Plaintiff:
Diangela Lay
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lay v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2022cv01944
Plaintiff:
Lisa Carolyn Lay
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Filing Error
as 5:2022cv01938
Plaintiff:
Lisa Carolyn Lay
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Lay v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01854
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
Brad Lay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Frito-Lay, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv02429
Defendant:
Bryant Michael and Frito-Lay, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Angela Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lay v. Ohio Department of Corrections Rehabilitations (O.D.R.C.)
as 2:2020cv05461
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Corrections Rehabilitations (O.D.R.C.)
Plaintiff:
Clarence H. Lay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lay v. The Hartford et al
as 1:2020cv00404
Defendant:
GROUP SHORT TERM, LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF NEW HORIZONS CREDIT UNION, INC., - The Hartford and The Hartford
Plaintiff:
Catherine A Lay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
