Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Baldock v. Kijakazi
as 22-1668
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEANN L BALDOCK and LEANN L. BALDOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Comfort, et al v. Lynn School Committee, et al
as 08-1735
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMANTHA J. COMFORT, on behalf of her minor child and next friend E.N., TODD BOLLEN, on behalf of his minor child, LAURIE BOLLEN and others
Plaintiff:
RHONDA CAMPBELL, KAREN AGNEW, on behalf of her minor child and next friend S.B., ANDREW DIGAETANO, on behalf of his minor child and next friend A.D. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNN SCHOOL COMMITTEE, CITY OF LYNN, MA, PATRICK J. MCMANUS and others
:
, , and others
Walden, et al v. Providence, RI, et al
as 08-1039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS WALDEN, CHRISTOPHER P. O'HALLORAN, DONALD J. DUBUQUE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
Defendant:
VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his former official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence
Movant - Movant:
RI STATE POLICE and RI ATTORNEY GENERAL
Walden, et al v. Providence, RI, et al
as 08-1021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS WALDEN, CHRISTOPHER P. O'HALLORAN, DONALD J. DUBUQUE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
Defendant:
VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his former official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence
Movant - Movant:
RI STATE POLICE and RI ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
