Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 211
MAN v. LAWRENCE et al
as 1:2015mc00113
Defendant: THE HONORABLE SARAH EVANS BARKER, CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER, WHITNEY COOPER and others
Plaintiff: MAN
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC. v. VICARS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv00185
Plaintiff: JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC.
Defendant: LEANN RICHARDSON, THE WING COMPANY LLC and DARLENE VICARS
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unlawful Reception Broadcast Signal i.e., Satellite Comm.
DAVIS v. LARIVA
as 2:2015cv00403
Petitioner: JIM WESLEY DAVIS
Respondent: LEANN LARIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scroggin v. Dawson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00432
Plaintiff: Brandon Lee Scroggin
Defendant: Peggy Dawson, Corizon Medical Services, Nancy Burdine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Reed v. Leann LaRiva
as 15-3594
Petitioner: MICHAEL HOWARD REED
Respondent: LEANN LARIVA
Daniel Riley v. Leann LaRiva
as 15-3523
Petitioner - Appellant: DANIEL J. RILEY
Respondent - Appellee: LEANN LARIVA
SEBOLT v. LARIVA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00353
Defendant: MELISSA J. BAYLESS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, LEANN LARIVA and others
Plaintiff: PHILIP M. SEBOLT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Louis Early v. Leann LaRiva
as 15-3386
Petitioner - Appellant: LOUIS H. EARLY
Respondent - Appellee: LEANN LARIVA
Manolo Blahnik International Limited v. Shi
as 1:2015cv09494
Plaintiff: Manolo Blahnik International Limited
Defendant: Lirong Shi, Manoloblahniksandalen.NL, A Cobbler Workshop and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
WESTOVER v. LARIVA
as 2:2015cv00332
Respondent: LEANN LARIVA
Petitioner: MICHAEL B. WESTOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?