Cases 21 - 30 of 90
ANDERSON v. HAWK et al
as 1:2016cv02391
Defendant:
RACHEL ALACANTARA, BARKAS, BELHUEMER and others
Plaintiff:
ANTAEUS ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILES v. BAILEY et al
as 2:2016cv00333
Defendant:
BAILEY, GENEVIEVE DAUGHTERY, GOSSETT and others
Plaintiff:
DAMON GILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ABNER v. EVERSON et al
as 4:2016cv00136
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE ABNER, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, RONALD EVERSON, CHARLES MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEAFFER v. CAROUTHERS et al
as 4:2016cv00131
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, RONALD EVERSON, CHARLES MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
BRYCE ALLEN SHEAFFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLACK v. BARNES & THORNBURG LLP PLAN et al
as 1:2016cv01214
Defendant:
BARNES & THORNBURG LLP PLAN and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
LEANNE BLACK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
ERVIN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv00964
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
LEANN ERVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
EARLY v. SHEPHERD et al
as 2:2016cv00085
Defendant:
IAN CONNORS, PAUL M. LAIRD, LEANN LARIVA and others
Plaintiff:
LOUIS H. EARLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MAN v. LAWRENCE et al
as 1:2015mc00113
Defendant:
THE HONORABLE SARAH EVANS BARKER, CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER, WHITNEY COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
MAN
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC. v. VICARS et al
as 4:2015cv00185
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC.
Defendant:
LEANN RICHARDSON, THE WING COMPANY LLC and DARLENE VICARS
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unlawful Reception Broadcast Signal i.e., Satellite Comm.
DAVIS v. LARIVA
as 2:2015cv00403
Petitioner:
JIM WESLEY DAVIS
Respondent:
LEANN LARIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
