Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
FIVE LEAF, LLC v. THAR PROCESS, INC.
as 2:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
FIVE LEAF, LLC
Defendant:
THAR PROCESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
MCCANN et al v. NEURONETICS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01132
Defendant:
LEAF CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC and NEURONETICS, INC.
Plaintiff:
TMS OF LOUISIANA, LLC, M.D. SHAWN MCCANN and SHAWN MCCANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
NEW LEAF RECOVERY SERVICES, P.C. v. EHT PHARMACY, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
NEW LEAF RECOVERY SERVICES, P.C.
Defendant:
EHT PHARMACY, LLC , SPECIALTY CARE RX LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NEW LEAF RECOVERY SERVICES, PC v. WOODS PHARMACY, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
NEW LEAF RECOVERY SERVICES, PC
Defendant:
WOODS PHARMACY, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEAF CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC v. RINK
as 2:2015cv06328
Plaintiff:
LEAF CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC
Defendant:
DOUGLAS RINK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LEAF CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC v. UNIVERSAL CARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv03068
Plaintiff:
LEAF CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL CARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, LLC, LOUISIANA SENIOR CARE COALITION, LLC, JOSEPH P. EAGLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEAF v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2014cv04126
Petitioner:
FAHEEM LEAF
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
