Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Leander Calhoun v. Talladega City Police Dept., et al
as 17-14892
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEANDER CALHOUN
Defendant - Appellee: TALLADEGA CITY POLICE DEPT., KEN SISK, WREN COOLEY and others
Calhoun v. City of Talladega et al
as 1:2017cv00742
Plaintiff: Leander Calhoun
Defendant: City of Talladega, Municipal Jail of Talladega County and Ken Sisk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. Talladega County City Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00261
Plaintiff: Leander Calhoun
Defendant: Talladega County City Police Department, Ken Sisk, Wren Cooley and others
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00341
Plaintiff: Leander Calhoun
Defendant: Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas, Phyllis Billups and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. Billups et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv02200
Petitioner: Leander Calhoun
Respondent: Phyllis Billups and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Calhoun v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2012cv02251
Plaintiff: Leander Calhoun
Defendant: State of Alabama, Ken Sisk and Wren Cooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Leander Calhoun
as 12-13259
Petitioner: In re: LEANDER CALHOUN
: SERVICE
Calhoun v. Barrett et al
as 1:2012cv01852
Petitioner: Leander Calhoun
Respondent: Bobby Barrett and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Calhoun v. Barrett et al
as 1:2012cv00159
Petitioner: Leander Calhoun
Respondent: Barrett and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Calhoun v. Cummins et al
as 1:2010cv01978
Petitioner: Leander Calhoun
Respondent: John Cummins and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?